📷 Image: Wikimedia Commons / Arjunaraoc
National
AP High Court Warns Against Over-Reliance on AI in Legal Affidavits
✍️ The Indian Express
🗓 30 Oct 2026, 07:23 PM
👁 2
The Andhra Pradesh High Court has cautioned legal practitioners that artificial intelligence should be treated as a supportive tool rather than a replacement for human judgment in drafting affidavits.
The Andhra Pradesh High Court has issued a significant directive regarding the integration of artificial intelligence in legal proceedings. The bench emphasized that while AI technologies can enhance efficiency, they must not be used to bypass the fundamental responsibilities of legal professionals.
In its observation, the court described AI as a 'tool, not a master substitute.' This distinction highlights the judiciary's stance that human oversight remains critical in the preparation of legal documents, particularly affidavits which carry significant legal weight.
The ruling serves as a caution to advocates and litigants in the state, urging them to verify the accuracy and authenticity of content generated by AI algorithms. The court's remarks reflect a broader trend among Indian judiciaries to regulate the use of emerging technologies within the legal framework.
This development underscores the need for a balanced approach where technology assists in research and drafting but does not replace the ethical and professional diligence required in the legal system.
In its observation, the court described AI as a 'tool, not a master substitute.' This distinction highlights the judiciary's stance that human oversight remains critical in the preparation of legal documents, particularly affidavits which carry significant legal weight.
The ruling serves as a caution to advocates and litigants in the state, urging them to verify the accuracy and authenticity of content generated by AI algorithms. The court's remarks reflect a broader trend among Indian judiciaries to regulate the use of emerging technologies within the legal framework.
This development underscores the need for a balanced approach where technology assists in research and drafting but does not replace the ethical and professional diligence required in the legal system.